Recently I’ve been coming across newspaper cuttings about Fanny Bullock Workman, a guest lecturer at the Royal Scottish Geographical Society and a remarkable woman by all accounts. I was intrigued by the presence of a supporter at her lectures, one who was obviously content with taking a back seat and a comparatively minor share of the limelight: Dr William Hunter Workman, her husband.
In view of the fact that Fanny’s lectures took place in 1900, when women were still expected to conform with oppressive Victorian expectations, this seemed highly unusual. Then I noticed that she had just climbed a mountain of 21,000 feet, a world record for a female climber at that time. What an astonishing achievement. Fanny was obviously a woman to be reckoned with.
One of my first reactions was to Google an image of her. Up came a delightful black-and-white photo, obviously a studio portrait, of an expensively-dressed woman with strong dark brows and exuberant hair done up bouffant-style, with one hand resting lightly on the shoulder of her seated husband. Fanny looks young, fresh-skinned and composed, but there’s something about her face – a kind of immutable determination. Suddenly, you can begin to see her climbing mountains. William, on the other hand, seems quite a bit older, his hair grey and thinning, but there’s nothing in his expression to make you think that his energy is being drained away. These two must have an interesting dynamic.
Fanny Bullock Workman was born in 1859 in Worcester, Massachusetts. She was the daughter of a state governor, and her family’s considerable wealth guaranteed her a privileged education. As a young woman she was sent to a finishing school in New York before travelling to Paris and Dresden to refine her French and German. When she returned to the US, she married a successful physician 12 years her senior; together they went climbing in the mountains of New Hampshire, developing some serious skills and joining climbing clubs that, unlike most of their European counterparts, admitted women as well as men.
Having reached the summit of Mount Washington, Fanny set her sights on new challenges. She was still in her twenties, energetic and ambitious; by contrast, William was suffering from the stress of over-work, and in 1889 he opted for early retirement. They had a four-year-old daughter, and the rest of Fanny’s life must have looked worryingly comfortable and suburban. A complete change was in order. Dr Workman might have been planning on showing his prize dahlias and putting in a row of onions, but he was going to have to think again.
With their finances boosted by the inherited estates of their respective parents, Fanny and William moved to Dresden. As if by magic, Dr Workman’s health recovered with the change of scene, and the couple started to look around them for adventure. It came from an unusual source: the newly-patented ‘Rover’ safety bicycle was taking Europe by storm, its two identically-sized wheels giving it huge advantages over the preposterous penny-farthing. Added to this, the revolutionary design meant that riders could actually put their feet on the ground when they stopped, which must have been an enormous relief. Fanny and William bought one each. With them, they planned to boldly go where no cyclist had gone before.
In 1895, carrying 20 pounds of luggage apiece, and leaving their daughter in the care of nursemaids, Fanny and William set off across Spain. They travelled 2,800 miles, and covered an average distance of 45 miles per day. The journey was not without incident, partly because their bicycles were objects of immense curiosity. On one occasion, having locked them up downstairs and gone to bed in their lodgings, they were awoken by a terrific din that was caused by all the villagers who had broken in and were squabbling over who should try them first. In the morning, the handlebar of one cycle was found to be twisted and the brake was damaged. Fanny was not best pleased.
Afterwards the Workmans co-authored a book called ‘Sketches Awheel in Modern Iberia’, which set the tone for future journeys: together, they would ride across Algeria, Italy and India, recording their observations in words and photographs and offering lectures to institutions all over Europe.
Fanny climbed Mont Blanc and the Matterhorn, providing indisputable proof that a woman could tackle the highest Alpine peaks. It was only a matter of time before she clapped eyes on the Himalayas, and the revelation came when the Workmans were travelling through India in 1897. Driven up into the cool foothills by the intense summer heat, Fanny caught a glimpse of the distant summits, glistening and pristine and beckoning, and in that same second she wanted to climb them. It was a game-changing moment, but the Workmans were nothing if not resourceful. They abandoned their bicycles and hired a Swiss mountain guide: Matthias Zurbriggen, one of the most talented of his profession.
If someone had explained to Fanny about altitude sickness and all the other pitfalls of Himalayan mountaineering, she might have listened politely but you wonder whether she would have paid much attention. As it was, nothing much was known in the late 1800s about the effects of oxygen starvation or frostbite, and Fanny, clad in thick serviceable skirts and hob-nailed boots, was not to be trifled with. In the company of her equally dauntless husband, she was already picturing herself triumphantly on the crest of successive unknown peaks.
Amazingly, the Workmans lived to tell their story, and in December 1900 they were invited to do so at several groups of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society. Fanny’s talk was entitled “Amid the Snows of Baltistan”:
“Mrs Bullock Workman gave an account of a mountaineering expedition in Kashmir, describing in vivid and picturesque language the difficulties and the pleasures, as well as the scientific results of the undertaking. The highest altitude attained was 21,000 feet, this point being reached in the midst of a storm and after the endurance of great fatigue. She had had the satisfaction of making three pioneer ascents, and in a beautiful descriptive passage she pictured the majesty and grandeur of the scenery, and the impressive solitude in which alone the voice of nature was most truly heard.” Glasgow Herald, 5th December 1900
Fanny’s revelations about her expedition were enough to raise the hairs on most of her listeners’ elegantly-hatted heads. She was no drama queen, however, and appeared to take every obstacle in her stride. Accompanied by 50 servants and porters, the Workmans had been obliged to ford the Askor torrent 12 times as they followed their route upwards, before reaching the pass of Skoro La at 17,000 feet. A flimsy rope bridge across the Braldu river, spanning a gaping chasm of 270 feet, Fanny described simply as “one of the longest and most trying in the country”; and when she and William finally reached the Skoro La and were advised that it was too early in the year to cross it, they resolved to “open the pass for the season”, as if it was a mere formality that was just awaiting the arrival of the appropriate dignitaries.
Over the Biafo glacier, whose formidable ranks of séracs and crevasses would have made most mountaineers blanch with dismay, and then on to the slopes themselves: within a couple of weeks Fanny was standing on the summit of Koser Gunge at 21,000 feet, an achievement which also placed her on top of the world as far as the exploits of women climbers were concerned. (This was not her ‘lifetime high’: in 1906 she stood on Pinnacle Peak at 22,736 feet in the Nun Kun Massif, setting an elevation record which was not surpassed until 1934.)
Fanny’s presentations were accompanied by limelight views, still a relatively new feature of RSGS lectures, and the Aberdeen Journal gave careful credit to the lantern operator whose job it was to set fire to a pellet of lime placed in a specially-designed lantern. Once it was alight, the flame was intensified with the careful addition of bottled oxygen and hydrogen, and the resulting glow was used to illuminate the slides.
“The lecture was very well illustrated by limelight lantern views, the lantern being manipulated by Mr Stott, of Messrs Walker & Company, Bridge Street, Aberdeen. The slides showed the snow-clad peaks, three of which were explored and named by the party, the morraines, glaciers, crags &c; while several picturesque cloud effects upon the mountains were applauded. At the close of a most interesting lecture, Lord Provost Fleming proposed a hearty vote of thanks to the gifted and courageous lady who had lectured to them so entertainingly that evening.” Aberdeen Journal, 11th December 1900
One of the interesting things about Fanny was her apparent immunity to altitude sickness. She climbed at a slow pace, requiring many overnight camps, and her leisurely progress must have allowed her to acclimatise gradually to the increasing height. In this way, her physical limitations gave her a huge advantage. Nor did she care about the squalor of the accommodation which she was frequently compelled to endure. The things that really annoyed her were incompetence and laziness, and her reprimands often invoked terror among the unwary porters. Some of them ran away.
The Workmans made eight expeditions to the Himalayas over a period of 14 years, and were only prevented from continuing by the outbreak of the First World War, when the much-disputed regions of Central Asia were apparently too dangerous even for Fanny to countenance. Had she done so, however, and had the Workmans braved the Pamirs and the Karakoram Pass with their customary sangfroid and terrifying organisational capacity, there is no telling how much sooner the war might have ended.
In her reports and lectures Fanny seems to be quite a detached observer, describing the people and the landscapes in the professional manner of a surveyor rather than with the emotional response of a travel writer. This is a reflection of the Workmans’ attitude to exploration as a whole: they held themselves apart from local people, and did not generally immerse themselves in traditional culture and customs. They were prepared to pay for legions of porters, and on many occasions they were forced to pay generously in order to persuade men to go where their better instincts told them they should not – largely through self-preservation; but there isn’t a great deal of empathy in their writing.
There was one subject, however, which roused Fanny to full-blown anger, and that was the issue of women’s rights. Women, she believed, were just as capable as men, and she had proved it by shattering the male exclusivity of Himalayan climbing. Whenever she saw women being suppressed or abused, she spoke out and demanded justice. Women’s suffrage was a cause that she took to her heart, and in 1912 she was photographed on the Siachen Glacier in the Karakoram, holding a newspaper with the headline ‘VOTES FOR WOMEN’. This simple but brilliant piece of publicity was flashed around the world – relatively speaking – giving a clear message to women everywhere, and bringing the issue to the forefront of public awareness. Politicians would soon come to regret their dismissal of suffragettes as attention-seeking extremists with a taste for melodrama. As for Fanny, she left them in no doubt of her own sentiments.
Most of the women explorers I’ve encountered so far have been wayward and fairly solitary by nature, led by their heart, making decisions based on instinct rather than intention. They see danger and they go there, wantonly, revelling in the risk and usually coming out unscathed. Fanny is slightly different. She doesn’t appear to appreciate the danger at all, because she gives very little time to it in her mind. Instead, she sees an ambition and works out a way to fulfil it through meticulous planning, like an experienced army general contemplating a large-scale military manoeuvre.
What lies beneath the surface may be a sense of close-guarded vulnerability: as a mother, she could never be accused of being over-protective, as she was absent for long periods in her daughter’s childhood; and her lost her second child, Siegfried, while he was still an infant. Her emotions must have been kept private, but found escape in other ways, and in support of other things: certainly her relationship with William must have been built on a strong foundation, as the two seem to have enjoyed their combined career as explorers and writers, viewing the world from a similar standpoint and offering each other constant and steadfast support.
Forceful and commanding she might have been, but you have to admire Fanny for the qualities that brought her an extraordinary degree of success. She doesn’t seem to have known a moment’s self-doubt, and she rose to prominence as a respected explorer, writer and lecturer with an assurance that was way ahead of her time. When John Clarke of Aberdeen University gave Fanny a vote of thanks after her lecture, he expressed admiration not just for her formidable achievements but also for her recent tour of Europe, during which she delivered talks fluently in both French and German.
Fanny received France’s highest literary title – Officer de L’Instruction Publique – and she was the first American woman to lecture at the Sorbonne in Paris. Honours from academic societies were showered upon her. Among them was the Fellowship of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society, awarded in 1898, making her the Society’s second female Fellow after Isabella Bird.
Fanny died in 1925, aged 66; surprisingly, William outlived her, and passed away in 1937 at the age of 90. Their daughter, Rachel, married a wealthy Scotsman who later became a baronet, giving her the title of Lady Rachel Workman MacRobert. She continued her mother’s strong-minded support of women’s rights and also became a specialist in geology, studying in London, Edinburgh and Sweden.
Fanny is one of the remarkable explorers included in my book, ‘The Great Horizon’ (Sandstone Press).
Sources & reference:
- Fanny Bullock Workman FRSGS (1899) ‘Ascent of the Biafo Glacier and Hispar Pass: Two Pioneer Ascents in the Karakoram’, Scottish Geographical Magazine 15:10, 523-526
- Fanny Bullock Workman FRSGS MRAS (1901) ‘Amid the Snows of Baltistan’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 17:2, 74-86
- Fanny Bullock Workman FRSGS (1913) ‘Some notes on my 1912 expedition to the Siachen, on Rose Glacier, eastern Karakoram’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 29:1, 13-17
- RSGS archives of newspaper cuttings and ephemera
- The American Alpine Club
- New England Historical Society
- Adventure Journal
Further reading – books by Fanny Bullock Workman and William Hunter Workman
- ‘Sketches Awheel in Modern Iberia’ (1897)
- ‘Through Town and Jungle – Fourteen thousand miles awheel among the temples and people of the Indian Plain’ (1904)
- ‘Ice-Bound Heights of the Mustagh’ (1908)
- ‘Peaks and Glaciers of the Nun Kun’ (1909)
- ‘The Call of the Snowy Hispar’ (1911)
- ‘Two Summers in the Ice-Wilds of Eastern Karakoram’ (1916)
Books about women travellers
- ‘On Top of the World – Five Women Explorers in Tibet’ by Luree Miller
- ‘Victorian Lady Travellers’ by Dorothy Middleton
All images via Wikimedia Commons except photo of lecture ticket, © Jo Woolf via RSGS archives
If you’d like to read about some more inspiring women explorers, take a look at my posts on Freya Stark, Isabella Bird, and Isobel Wylie Hutchison.
10 thoughts on “Fanny Bullock Workman – a woman of substance”
Bookmarked to read more leisurely later….thanks once again for the inspiration 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s good – yes, another inspirational woman, and I hope you’ll enjoy reading about her! 🙂
Wow!! What a woman. Great story Jo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Susan! Fanny was such a strong character – proof that you can do anything you set your mind to! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
A strong minded individual, for sure. I like the idea that pacing herself may have helped her accomplish more. And you’re writing a book? Brava! I will be looking forward to that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, that’s an interesting thing, Pat. Slow and steady was the secret for Fanny, at least. And yes, yay, a book! We’re about to start publicising it at RSGS so I’ll let you know more here very soon. Thank you! 🙂
Another remarkable explorer beautifully described, and interesting that you note the differences in attitude between her and some of the other ladies you’ve researched. I love the photos, especially that one of her holding the newspaper. Your book is sure to be a cracking read, do you have any more information about it yet? That’s quite an undertaking, 50 different explorers. I’m looking forward to hearing more about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much, Lorna! It’s fascinating to see the differences and similarities between the women I’ve written about so far. In general, they all ‘go with the flow’ in contrast to many male-based expeditions – especially in the early days – which were very much like a big military exercise. Fanny is slightly different in that respect, and she was very competitive, going out of her way to disprove rival claims to a ‘female highest’. The support of women’s rights is an interesting aspect, and she really deserves admiration for that. Thank you for your comment about the book! We’re putting together some publicity information so I’ll have more details very soon. Writing about 50 explorers is like juggling with plates but they all seem to be getting along together so far! 🙂
Incredible individual…what a well-lived life…Really fascinating! The rigors of remote climbing expeditions in those times must have been so daunting, yet the rewards, the majesty, the opportunity to experience a landscape and culture before the homogenization of more recent times, the solitude…must have been so exhilarating, and, one would imagine, addictive. Great to hear you have a book in the works…very exciting! Look forward to having a chance to learn something about the lives of some of these monumental mountaineers : )
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know – she was really ahead of her time, and didn’t mind who knew it. That is so true about mountaineering at that time – it was such a huge challenge and you were stepping into the unknown, but the rewards must have been immense. Certainly Fanny and William found it addictive. Thank you, Jo! Can’t wait to tell you more. There are some amazing and inspiring people in the RSGS’s history! 🙂
Comments are closed.